Integrating principles from neuroscience into your questionnaire design can enhance both the quality and the reliability of the data you collect. By aligning your survey structure with the cognitive processes of the human brain, you can foster more accurate and meaningful responses. Here’s how to achieve that:
The brain can only handle so much information at once. Overly complex questions can be overwhelming, resulting in straightlining, random responses, or even survey dropoff.
Recommendation: Keep it simple. Questions should be clear and concise to maximize attention span and prevent overload.
Instead of:
“In 2023, the US inflation rate of consumer goods hovered around 3.4%, while in 2024, the rate of inflation for consumer goods has been lower at approximately 2.9%. Do you find yourself spending more, less, or the same amount on goods during 2024 compared to 2023 when accounting for potential changes in inflation?”
Try:
“How has your general spending changed from 2023 to 2024?" Separately, you can then ask about the impact of inflation on their spending.
People often forget or fail to recall the details of past events. For example, if you were to ask someone how many times they watched a movie in the past year, they probably wouldn't know the exact number. Instead, they estimate, which may be over or under the actual number of times they watched movies.
Recommendation: Use prompts to help jog their memories, and when possible, ask about shorter, more recent timeframes that are easier to remember.
Instead of:
“How many times did you visit a doctor in the last two years?”
Try:
"In the past six months, how many times did you visit a primary care provider (PCP)? Please think about routine check-ups, follow-up appointments, and any visits for new health concerns."
The brain has a tendency to ignore repetitive stimuli. If your survey asks very similar questions or repeatedly uses the same question format, respondents might start skimming through without giving much thought to their answers.
Recommendation: Mix up your question formats throughout the survey by using different question types. A variety of Likert scales, multiple-choice questions, and open-ended questions can help keep respondents engaged. You can also try grouping questions of a similar type together, such as attitudinal questions on a 5-point agree/disagree scale.
If respondents are under pressure (e.g., multitasking while taking the survey) or experiencing cognitive overload, they may feel the survey is taking longer than it actually is. As the perceived time grows, they are more likely to rush through the questions and not give thoughtful responses.
Recommendation: Set expectations at the beginning of the survey to tell them how long it is expected to take (e.g., 10-12 minutes) and use progress indicators to help respondents maintain a sense of forward momentum.
Humans are not great at predicting the future, including upcoming behaviors and events. Forecast questions, such as “How confident are you that you will purchase product X in the next year?” may be overestimated based on the respondent's current optimism, which may not match their future state of mind.
Recommendation: Integrate a calibration factor based on historical data where available. For example, when running “future-focused” purchase likelihood questions, you can review previous studies that compare stated purchase intent with actual purchase behavior. Adjust the final forecast based on this calibration to account for the common overstatement likelihood.
Neural synchrony, or the coordinated firing of neurons, is vital for cognitive processes like attention and memory. Our brains expect things to proceed in a logical fashion, so when topics shift abruptly, neural synchrony is thrown off balance. This can lead to reduced engagement, lower quality answers, and increased drop-out rates.
Recommendation: Design questionnaires with an intuitive flow to preserve respondents’ neural synchrony. For example, when developing a survey to test a new product concept, you could place an interesting attitudinal question about the product category at the beginning to prime the respondent for upcoming questions. Next, you could ask usage questions, followed by the presentation of new stimuli, such as packaging design mockups.
The brain doesn't create memories in isolation but rather takes into account the context and circumstances happening at that time. That means that when respondents are asked to recall experiences from one context (e.g., workplace behaviors) while situated in another (e.g., at home), the accuracy of their memories may differ from the original experience.
Recommendation: Incorporate relatable scenarios or familiar reference points within your questions to trigger more accurate memory recall.
Instead of:
“How often did you use public transportation last month?”
Try:
“Thinking about your daily commute and any weekend activities, how many times did you use public transportation in the last four weeks?”
Following a highly emotional or provocative question, the brain may experience an "attention blink," a brief period during which it misses the next piece of information. For example, if a survey asks about a highly controversial topic and then the next question is about a totally different subject, the respondent may experience a brief lapse in attention since their brain is still processing emotions from the previous question.
Recommendation: When asking emotionally charged questions, try using a "transition" question before moving on to the next critical topic.
Neuroscientific principles can benefit questionnaire design in many ways. By aligning your survey with cognitive processes, you can help respondents answer questions more accurately and with greater reliability.
Our dedicated market research team stands ready to assist you with questionnaire development and execution. For more information, please contact us today.